River Linking
There has been a lot of discussion on the advantages of linking rivers , and plans of thousands of crores to make this dream come true. I believe that this idea seems to be flawed.Though it may seem interesting at first sight and may gives hopes of better distribution of water over flooded and parched regions, it has hidden within it big unknowns that may sink whatever good that we may perceive to come out of it.
One of the problems is the building of large dams , that threaten to destroy a large amount of forests and displace many a tribal. Not only are we short of forests, which we can ill afford to loose, large dams result in breaking the flow of the river causing irreversible damage to the river ecosystem. The history of dam rehabilitaion in India has been only been dismal with poor and weak people being shifted to lands that are much worse than what they lived on - often without basic facilities , even of a rural habitation.
The second problem is that inter-basin transfer involves in every case an inter-state transfer which is a potential bottleneck, causing large problems during the working of the project. Demand for water is bound to grow and surpluses may not remain, which cause more political friction and delays.
The third and most serious argument is that changing the pattern of river flows can highly destabilising, river course changes , bank collapeses , damage to rich ecosystems at the river mouth and larger host of related problems. The basic problem is that this project involves shifting a large amount of water from one basin to another.This causes a deficit in the water volume in the source basin, which may disrupt the natural cycles in the river.
The premise that floods are bad , is qualified , that floods are bad for urban settlements. Floods are a natural cleansing action of a river , action that deposit silt - increase fertility of agricultural plains and bring nutrients from the moutains to the deltas. It is only when humans have inhabited and monopolised river banks that floods assume their terrible form. By seeking to deprive a river of floods we are trying to remove a part of the river. The consequences of this are hard to find , but can come in unimaginable forms. We cannot afford to kill our rivers , for most of India revolves around rivers .
Save our rivers.
There has been a lot of discussion on the advantages of linking rivers , and plans of thousands of crores to make this dream come true. I believe that this idea seems to be flawed.Though it may seem interesting at first sight and may gives hopes of better distribution of water over flooded and parched regions, it has hidden within it big unknowns that may sink whatever good that we may perceive to come out of it.
One of the problems is the building of large dams , that threaten to destroy a large amount of forests and displace many a tribal. Not only are we short of forests, which we can ill afford to loose, large dams result in breaking the flow of the river causing irreversible damage to the river ecosystem. The history of dam rehabilitaion in India has been only been dismal with poor and weak people being shifted to lands that are much worse than what they lived on - often without basic facilities , even of a rural habitation.
The second problem is that inter-basin transfer involves in every case an inter-state transfer which is a potential bottleneck, causing large problems during the working of the project. Demand for water is bound to grow and surpluses may not remain, which cause more political friction and delays.
The third and most serious argument is that changing the pattern of river flows can highly destabilising, river course changes , bank collapeses , damage to rich ecosystems at the river mouth and larger host of related problems. The basic problem is that this project involves shifting a large amount of water from one basin to another.This causes a deficit in the water volume in the source basin, which may disrupt the natural cycles in the river.
The premise that floods are bad , is qualified , that floods are bad for urban settlements. Floods are a natural cleansing action of a river , action that deposit silt - increase fertility of agricultural plains and bring nutrients from the moutains to the deltas. It is only when humans have inhabited and monopolised river banks that floods assume their terrible form. By seeking to deprive a river of floods we are trying to remove a part of the river. The consequences of this are hard to find , but can come in unimaginable forms. We cannot afford to kill our rivers , for most of India revolves around rivers .